(Chicago, IL) – June 30, 2010. State Senator Dave Syverson (R-Rockford) yesterday outrageously—and erroneously—claimed that Illinois has “the richest Medicaid system in the country” while criticizing Governor Pat Quinn over the new Illinois budget.
In response to news that the federal government may not extend an additional $750 million to the Illinois Medicaid system, Syverson, a 17-year legislative veteran said:
“Are we going to have the richest Medicaid system in the country? Are we going to have a state that says we don’t care where you’re from…you come into our state and we’re going to provide you with healthcare at higher levels than other states do?”
The problem, however, is that Syverson’s assessment is completely wrong.
Rhode Island has the richest Medicaid system in the country, spending $8,082 per enrollee in 2006, the latest data available, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. In fact, Illinois ranks near the bottom of Medicaid spending per enrollee at #41. Illinois spends $4,129 per enrollee, while only nine other states spend less.
As the Minority Spokesman of the Senate Human Services Committee, Syverson should have a basic grasp of Illinois Medicaid spending. He is either disingenuous or ignorant on the issue. Either way, Syverson can have no credibility on the Illinois budget debate if he misrepresents such a key financial piece driving the budget.
Syverson’s problem is, however, the Illinois Republican Party’s larger problem—the lack of credibility. Illinois House Republicans and Illinois Senate Republicans continue to offer budget assessments and solutions that are completely out of whack with fiscal reality.
If they actually want to play a substantive role in solving Illinois’ budget problems, they need to start by getting their facts straight.
D.S. is a puerile Republicant party hack (i.e. LIAR) sucking up to the Rove – Norquist war chest of cash.Posted by MacGruner | February 18, 2011, 8:57 AM
Dave reminds me of Senator Kirk. Both seem very eager to jump on the bandwagon of slashing whatever it takes to maintain record low taxes for the wealthy while leaving out ‘for the wealthy’ publicly.Posted by MacGruner | February 18, 2011, 3:12 PM